Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Poor sustained sputum culture conversion rates with the standard-of-care therapy highlight the need for better drugs to treat Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)-optimized exposure of sarecycline and its potential role in treating MAC-PD. METHODS: We performed MIC studies with MAC ATCC 700898 and 19 clinical isolates and test-tube static concentration-response studies. A dynamic hollow-fibre system model of intracellular MAC (HFS-MAC) study was performed mimicking six human-equivalent sarecycline dose concentration-time profiles to identify the PK/PD optimal exposure of sarecycline for MAC kill. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model was used for PK/PD analysis. RESULTS: The sarecycline MIC of MAC ATCC 700898 was 1 mg/L, while the MIC for the 19 clinical strains ranged between 32 and >256 mg/L. The concentration mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was similar between intracellular and extracellular MAC. In the HFS-MAC, all six sarecycline doses killed intracellular MAC, with an Emax of 1.0 log10 cfu/mL below Day 0 burden (stasis). The sarecycline EC80 (optimal) exposure was identified as AUC0-24/MIC = 139.46. CONCLUSIONS: Sarecycline demonstrated anti-MAC Emax in the HFS-MAC model better than ethambutol but worse than omadacycline (>5 log10 cfu/mL below stasis) in HFS-MAC. However, since currently approved highest oral sarecycline dose achieves an AUC0-24 of 48.2 mg·h/L and MAC MICs are >32 mg/L, the target AUC0-24/MIC of 139.46 is unlikely to be achieved in patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: