Key result
The POSSUM scoring system accurately predicted post-operative morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (expected 43.81% vs observed 39.62%; no statistically significant difference).
Why the study?
Does the POSSUM scoring system accurately predict post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Cohort (n=265)
Does the POSSUM scoring system accurately predict post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 43.81% vs 39.62%
p-value: p=NS
The POSSUM scoring system is a valuable tool for accurately predicting the risk of post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
May support preoperative risk counseling in pancreaticoduodenectomy; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) is a predictive scoring system for post-operative morbidity. The present study assessed the value of POSSUM in predicting post-operative morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). POSSUM scores were prospectively calculated for 265 consecutive cases of PD performed between 2005 and 2007. Expected morbidity was estimated based on POSSUM scores and was compared with observed morbidity. Patients were also stratified into one of four groups based on their individual POSSUM scores and subsequent risk of morbidity. Mean expected morbidity was 43.81% (116 cases) and mean observed morbidity was 39.62% (105 cases) (no statistically significant difference). It is concluded that the POSSUM scoring system has high value for predicting the risk of morbidity in PD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=265). POSSUM scoring system vs. Observed outcomes was evaluated on Post-operative morbidity (p=NS). The POSSUM scoring system accurately predicted post-operative morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (expected 43.81% vs observed 39.62%; no statistically significant difference).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: