Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates body weight perception accuracy in obese youth, highlighting age and sex disparities.
Background: Pediatric obesity has become a public health epidemic, but many overweight and obese children consider their weight normal.While having overweight or obese peers and family members further reduces the likelihood of children correctly self-identifying as overweight or obese, accurate identification of current body weight status is necessary in order to initiate behavior change and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease.Objective: The objective of this study was to explore factors related to children's and adolescents' perceptions of current body weight status. Design and Participants: This cross-sectional study included data from 117 obese children and adolescents (n=76 female, 41 male) ages 4-17 years, attending the Medical University of South Carolina's Heart Health Program.Results: Thirty-seven percent of the sample accurately categorized their weight status; accuracy did not differ by race.Older children (>11.9 y) were more likely to accurately perceive their weight than younger children (p=0.02), and older girls were more likely to be accurate than older boys (p=0.03).Relatively larger children were also more likely to accurately perceive their weight (p=0.01).Logistic regression analyses revealed that after controlling for BMI-for-age percentile, older girls had a 1.4 times higher likelihood of accurately perceiving their weight status compared to all other children (p=0.12 for the gender-by-age interaction).Conclusions: In a cohort of obese children and adolescents at-risk for cardiovascular disease, boys and younger girls were less likely to correctly identify their current body weight status.An individualized, family-centered approach should be taken during clinic visits to address children's weight status, and patient education should be focused on encouraging gradual behavior change strategies in order to improve self-efficacy, preserve healthrelated quality of life, and reduce cardiovascular disease risk in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haselden et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: