Key result
The SMART trial is designed to compare the Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ and Edwards SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra TAVR devices for mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 12 months.
Why the study?
Patients with small aortic valve annuli are typically female and underrepresented in trials, and head-to-head performance data comparing the two most widely available commercial TAVR devices in this population are needed.
Does the Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ self-expanding device improve clinical outcomes and valve function compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra balloon-expandable device in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis with a small aortic valve annulus?
RCT
Does the Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ self-expanding device improve clinical outcomes and valve function compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra balloon-expandable device in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis with a small aortic valve annulus?
The SMART trial is designed to provide head-to-head comparative data on the two most widely used TAVR devices in patients with small aortic annuli, a population predominantly comprising women.
May support self-expanding TAVR preference in small-annulus patients; leaves open need for confirmatory randomized data on durability.
BACKGROUND: The SMall Annuli Randomized To Evolut or SAPIEN (SMART) Trial was designed to compare the performance of the two most widely available commercial transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis with a small aortic valve annulus undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Patients with small aortic valve annuli are typically female and are often underrepresented in clinical trials. METHODS: based on multi-detector computed tomography, and appropriate anatomy for both the Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ self-expanding and Edwards SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra balloon-expandable devices. The primary clinical outcome composite endpoint is defined as mortality, disabling stroke or heart failure rehospitalization at 12 months. The co-primary valve function composite endpoint is defined as bioprosthetic valve dysfunction at 12 months which includes hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction, defined as a mean gradient ≥20 mmHg, non-structural valve dysfunction, defined as severe prothesis-patient mismatch or ≥moderate aortic regurgitation, thrombosis, endocarditis, and aortic valve re-intervention. Powered secondary endpoints will be assessed hierarchically. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART trial will be the largest head-to-head comparative trial of transfemoral TAVR using the two most widely available contemporary TAVR devices in the setting of small aortic annuli and the largest trial to enroll primarily women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT04722250.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdel‐Wahab et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis with a small aortic valve annulus. Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ self-expanding device vs. Edwards SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra balloon-expandable device was evaluated on Composite of mortality, disabling stroke or heart failure rehospitalization at 12 months, and a co-primary of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction at 12 months. The SMART trial is designed to compare the Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ and Edwards SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra TAVR devices for mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure rehospitalization at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: