Key result
Closely spaced bipolar sensing prevented electrocautery-induced pacing inhibition (0% vs 95.7%) and incorrect ventricular fibrillation detection (0% vs 73.9%) compared to widely spaced sensing.
Why the study?
Does closely spaced bipolar sensing prevent electrocautery-induced EMI in patients with ICDs compared to widely spaced bipolar sensing?
Does closely spaced bipolar sensing prevent electrocautery-induced EMI in patients with ICDs compared to widely spaced bipolar sensing?
Programming ICDs to closely spaced bipolar sensing (true bipolar) effectively rejects electrocautery-induced EMI, potentially minimizing the need for perioperative device reprogramming.
BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) induced by electrocautery during surgery in patients with cardiac pacemakers or implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) may inhibit pacing and cause inappropriate tachyarrhythmia oversensing. In particular, susceptibility to EMI may be enhanced in ICDs by frequently used wide interelectrode sensing (i.e., integrated bipolar sensing). Consequently, ICD function is usually disabled preoperatively and restored later by noninvasive programming. Because sensing by closely spaced electrodes (i.e., true bipolar) may be less susceptible to EMI, preoperative programming to a true bipolar mode may minimize the need for perioperative programming while preserving device function. METHODS: Our study population consisted of 23 consecutive patients either receiving a new ICD or undergoing ICD pulse generator change. In each patient, electrocautery-induced EMI was initiated with the ICD in the closely spaced sensing configuration and again during widely spaced sensing. RESULTS: In comparing the 2 sensing modes, right ventricular electrogram amplitude was significantly greater and EMI noise amplitude tended to be greater with widely spaced bipolar sensing. Furthermore, widely spaced bipolar sensing was associated with ICD pacing inhibition in 22 of 23 patients and incorrect "ventricular fibrillation" detection in 17 of 23 patients. Conversely, closely spaced bipolar sensing was not accompanied by either pacing inhibition or incorrect ventricular fibrillation sensing. CONCLUSION: Closely spaced bipolar sensing (i.e., true bipolar) appropriately rejects electrocautery-induced EMI. Programming implanted devices to closely spaced bipolar sensing may minimize the need for perioperative reprogramming while preserving intraoperative device operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suresh et al. (2011) studied Patients receiving a new ICD or undergoing ICD pulse generator change (n=23). Closely spaced bipolar sensing vs. Widely spaced bipolar sensing was evaluated on ICD pacing inhibition. Closely spaced bipolar sensing prevented electrocautery-induced pacing inhibition (0% vs 95.7%) and incorrect ventricular fibrillation detection (0% vs 73.9%) compared to widely spaced sensing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: