Simulation modeling study reveals shifting ecological risk and resilience patterns across the Pearl River Delta, highlighting balanced development under moderate socioeconomic pathways.
Under climate change, the demand for high-quality urban ecological security is rising. This study focuses on how rapid urbanization and climate change affect ecological risk, resilience, and land use functions (LUFs) spatial co-variation in the Pearl River Delta. Land use was simulated under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) using system dynamics (SD) and the interaction network–Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (intPLUS) model. Ecological risk was quantified via the landscape ecological risk index (LERI) and habitat degradation index (HDI), while ecological resilience was obtained using an adaptability–resistance–recovery framework, producing a comprehensive ecological risk–resilience index (CERRI). Ecosystem services were assessed using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model. Spearman correlation, geographically weighted regression (GWR), constraint lines, and extreme gradient boosting with SHapley Additive exPlanations (XGBoost-SHAP) revealed LUFs patterns, nonlinear relationships and threshold effects, and driving factors. The results indicate that construction land expands mainly at the expense of cropland (~4049–4157 km2) from 2023 to 2035, while woodland and water remain largely stable. CERRI shows a concentric pattern (2023 domain mean = 0.638), with safer peripheral belts and a more risk-dominated central–southern core; under coupling-weight uncertainty with 2023-fixed common-reference normalization, SSP245 was preferred in all Monte Carlo iterations (best-scenario probability = 1.000). EF–LF, EF–PF and LF–PF retain stable nonlinear forms. Elevation, economic vitality and transport accessibility are the leading drivers, with model-derived breakpoints near low-elevation, high-vitality and moderately accessible transport nodes. This study provides the CERRI framework to support ecological security monitoring and adaptive land-use management, contributing to more sustainable regional development under climate change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: