Single-subject experimental study demonstrates improved matching and tacting in autistic children using a tablet app, indicating technology can bypass sensory barriers.
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a tablet application designed for image picture-to-picture matching, verbal-to-picture matching, and tact training in autistic children. The participants in the research were two school-age autistic children. The initial evaluation showed difficulties in picture-to-picture matching, verbal-to-picture matching and tact food and drinks in Italian. In addition, challenges were identified in using flashcards during training without tablets, as sensory-related stereotyped behaviors were observed, interfering with task engagement. Design/methodology/approach A single-subject experimental design with pre- and post-probe was used. The dependent variable is represented by the number of correct answers issued independently out of the total number of answer opportunities provided in the pre-probe and post-probe phases. The independent variable is represented by the teaching program of answers, which utilizes the tablet associated with constant time delay (Doyle et al., 1988; Mueller et al., 2007), along with physical guidance and verbal prompts. Findings The results obtained show a general improvement in the targeted skills. Practical implications The study highlights the practical benefits of using a tablet application that represents an innovative tool for educators and therapists who focus on developing verbal behavior skills. Originality/value This investigation examines the efficacy of using a tablet application with autistic children, in the context of verbal behavior, contributing to a new perspective of therapeutic intervention in the field of special education. The proposed approach combines ABA strategies with technology to overcome often underestimated sensory barriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozzato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: