Animal study reveals that CSF-contacting nucleus CGRP-RAMP1-PKA signaling drives neuropathic pain in trigeminal neuralgia models, highlighting this pathway as a therapeutic target.
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is prevalent form of neuropathic pain (NP). Its regulatory circuits and mechanisms remain unclear. The authors' previous work demonstrated that the cerebrospinal fluid-contacting nucleus (CSF-contacting nucleus) participates in the regulation of NP induced by sciatic nerve injury via the brain-CSF circuit. However, whether it mediates NP caused by trigeminal nerve injury has not been reported. Methods: This study used viral retrograde tracing to examine neural projections between the CSF-contacting nucleus and the trigeminal ganglion (TG). Neuronal activity in TN model was assessed using immunofluorescence, and chemogenetic tools were used to test its role in pain behavior. Local calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-RAMP1-PKA signaling changes and their modulation were analyzed for effects on TN. Results: Retrograde tracing confirmed neural projections between the CSF-contacting nucleus and the TG. In TN model rats, elevated c-Fos expression indicated its activation. Chemogenetic activation induced hyperalgesia in normal rats, whereas its inhibition reduced pain in TN rats. Molecular analyses revealed upregulation of CGRP, RAMP1, and components of the PKA pathway within the nucleus. Pathway inhibition via RAMP1 knockdown or olcegepant administration attenuated pain, with knockdown effect being reversible by cAMP. Conclusions: This study reveals that the CSF-contacting nucleus is activated during TN and participates in central pain regulation through its local CGRP-RAMP1-PKA signaling pathway. Intervening in this pathway effectively modulates pain behavior, suggesting that this nucleus and its signaling system may represent novel therapeutic targets for treating TN. These findings provide experimental evidence for understanding the central mechanisms of TN and developing analgesic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: