Methodological study demonstrates that log-linear model fit tests remain valid under random effects across categorical variables, suggesting robust evaluation despite potential statistical power loss.
In statistical analysis involving categorical explanatory variables, the traditional distinction defines effects as fixed when all categories are observed and random when only a subset of categories is observed. This distinction is well established in the context of Analysis of Variance. This paper extends the theory to situations where all variables in the analysis – not just the explanatory ones – are categorical. In such cases, log-linear models are the most common analytical approach. The main theoretical result demonstrates that if a log-linear model holds when considering all categories of the involved variables (fixed effects), it also holds when some variables are restricted to a subset of their categories (random effects). Consequently, model fit tests that are valid in the fixed effects case remain applicable in the random effects case, although this may lead to a reduction of power. These findings are illustrated through simulations that explore various scenarios in which only a subset of a variable's categories is observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: