Long-term field experiment reveals increased extractable carbon and nitrogen under no-till compared to chisel tillage in surface soil, suggesting enhanced soil organic matter preservation.
This study evaluated whether long-term no-till and chisel tillage differed in total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), alkaline-extractable fractions, and associated indices. A field experiment in Indiana, USA, began in 1983 with moldboard, ridge, chisel, and no-till systems within four crop-sequence plots. In 1998, moldboard was converted to chisel and ridge to no-till; thus, plots had been under their 2017 tillage system for either 34 or 19 years at sampling. Sixteen composite samples were collected from the 0 to 15 cm layer. Because each crop sequence occupied one main plot, crop sequence was treated as field history rather than as an independent factor. A planned contrast compared current no-till with current chisel while accounting for the historical tillage assignments. Compared with chisel, no-till increased TOC by 11%, total extractable carbon (TEC) by 32%, glucose-equivalent-corrected TEC by 32%, total extractable nitrogen by 50%, and total glucose-equivalent carbon by 31%; TN did not differ. Among the indices, only the humification ratio differed between tillage systems. Tillage effects were more consistent for extractable amounts than for relative or optical properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: