Cross-sectional registry study reveals low glycemic target attainment and frequent hypoglycemia in pediatric type 1 diabetes, highlighting persistent management hurdles despite advanced technology...
AIMS: The Behaviors, Therapies, TEchnologies and hypoglycemic Risk in Type 1 diabetes (BETTER) registry collects patient-reported outcomes and experiences on individuals living with type 1 diabetes in Canada. The objective of our study was to describe the management of type 1 diabetes reported by parents of children and young adolescents (< 14 years of age) enrolled in the BETTER registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation using self-reported data collected from April 2019 to October 2024. Parents of children and adolescents < 14 years self-registered and provided written online informed consent. As of October 2024, 699 children and adolescents < 14 years of age and living with type 1 diabetes were enrolled. RESULTS: Children had a mean age of 8.8 ± 3.1 years old with a diabetes duration of 2.3 ± 2.7 years, 44.9% were female, and 85.0% were of European ancestry. More than 80% used a continuous glucose monitoring system and 38.3% used an insulin pump. Most recent HbA1c ≤ 7% was reported by 15.9% of participants. At least 1 episode of level 2 hypoglycemia (glucose levels < 3.0 mmol/L, with ability to self-treat) in the last month was reported by 72.5% of participants, with a median number of episodes (interquartile range) of 5 (2, 10). The occurrence of level 3 hypoglycemia (low glucose, requiring help from another person, use of glucagon, hospitalization, or loss of consciousness) in the last 12 months was reported by 8.6% of participants. Among these, the median number of episodes was 1 (1, 3). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that, despite a wide use of continuous glucose monitoring, the occurrence of hypoglycemia is still high and the proportion of children and adolescents reaching the HbA1c target is low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Messier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: