Laboratory investigation reveals that tuning the nickel-cobalt molar ratio optimizes low-temperature carbon monoxide oxidation and sulfur resistance, indicating viable designs for flue gas...
A series of NixCo3−xO₄ (x = 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.25) catalysts with different Ni/Co molar ratios was fabricated via the co-precipitation method. The catalytic performance for CO oxidation and SO₂ resistance of the prepared catalysts was systematically investigated, and their physicochemical properties were characterized by XRD, SEM, BET, H₂-TPR, CO-TPD and in situ DRIFTS. The experimental results reveal that the Ni₂.₂₅Co₀.₇₅O₄ catalyst exhibits the optimal CO oxidation activity, achieving a CO conversion of 93.25% at 120 °C. The superior catalytic performance can be attributed to its large specific surface area, low reduction temperature, and easily activated lattice oxygen species. When exposed to SO₂ at a concentration 10 times the industrial emission limit, all catalysts exhibited varying degrees of activity loss. Among them, NiCo₂O₄ exhibited the slowest deactivation rate and showed the greatest recovery in CO conversion after SO₂ was cut off, suggesting relatively better sulfur tolerance and recoverability among the investigated catalysts. In conclusion, tuning the Ni/Co molar ratio can effectively optimize the low-temperature CO oxidation activity and sulfur resistance of Ni-Co composite oxides. This work provides a useful reference for the structural composition design and practical application of such catalysts in flue gas purification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: