Biomechanical screening study demonstrates aerodynamic crown-loading potential in urban London plane street trees, highlighting prioritized targets for municipal risk inspection.
Urban London plane (Platanus × acerifolia) street trees require efficient and interpretable methods for identifying individuals that warrant closer inspection within large roadside inventories. This study developed a two-layer screening framework for 2022 London plane trees along six urban roads in Nanjing, China. First, wind-tunnel tests of five standardized crown geometries were used to derive geometry-specific drag-moment coefficients and calculate aerodynamic crown-loading potential (ACLP), a relative indicator of crown-related aerodynamic demand. ACLP was calculated only for trees within the tested crown height-to-width range. Second, measurements from 19 windthrown London plane trees after Typhoon Bebinca were used to derive a local lower-quartile root-plate reference and calculate a root-plate reference aperture ratio (RPAR) from recorded tree-pit width. Of the 2022 inventoried trees, 1273 (63.0%) fell within the tested crown-geometry range, and 128 were identified as high-ACLP candidates using a 90th-percentile screening threshold. These candidates were strongly concentrated on two roads, and the principal road-level pattern remained stable across alternative percentile thresholds. The post-storm analysis provided a separate local reference for identifying tree-pit apertures that were comparatively small relative to observed root-plate dimensions. ACLP and RPAR should therefore be interpreted as distinct first-stage screening indicators rather than as predictors of windthrow probability or anchorage capacity. The framework provides a transparent basis for prioritizing follow-up field inspection and allocating limited urban tree-management resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: