Retrospective cohort study reveals rising mechanical ventilation dependency and key risk factors among hospitalized adults, highlighting critical targets for advance care planning.
Objectives To describe the incidence and risk factors for becoming dependent on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in Japan. Design Retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database from April 1, 2014, to March 31, 2020. Setting More than 1500 acute care hospitals participating in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Study Group Database, covering approximately 50% of all hospitalizations in acute care hospitals in Japan. Patients Adults (≥18 years), in whom IMV was initiated during hospitalization. IMV-dependency was defined as discharge while still receiving IMV after ≥7 days and having undergone tracheostomy during hospitalization. Interventions None. Measurements And Main Results Of the 388,752 patients in whom IMV was initiated, 7805 (2.0%) became IMV dependent. In-hospital mortality occurred in 138,111 (35.5%) patients, and 242,836 (62.5%) were discharged without IMV dependency. The incidence of IMV dependency increased over time, from 1.6% in 2014 to 2.4% in 2019. Patients who became IMV dependent had a mean age of 71.3 years, and 49% were ≥75 years. Emergency admissions accounted for 91.7% of cases, and 68.1% presented with impaired consciousness at admission. In multinomial regression analysis (reference: discharged alive without IMV dependency), older age (≥75 years; RRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.41-1.56), impaired consciousness at admission (RRR 1.75, 95% CI 1.63-1.88), emergency admission (RRR 2.18, 95% CI 1.97-2.42), and surgery prior to IMV (RRR 1.92, 95% CI 1.82-2.03) were independently associated with IMV dependency. Conclusions The incidence of IMV dependency increased over time. Identified risk factors may inform clinical decision-making and advance care planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohbe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: