Quasi-experimental study demonstrates improved knowledge and self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes, highlighting the value of culturally tailored pre-Ramadan education.
Background Managing type 2 diabetes becomes more difficult during fasting Ramadan. Alterations in meal timing, food choices, and medication schedules can increase the risk of glycemic complications. Although pre-Ramadan education is strongly recommended, there are still few culturally tailored interventions. Aim This study assessed the impact of a culturally appropriate pre-Ramadan nutritional education program on diabetes-related knowledge and practices for self-management. Methods A one-group, pretest–posttest quasi-experimental study was carried out in Egypt. A sample of 53 adults with type 2 diabetes was included. A culturally suitable intervention based on the guidelines of the International Diabetes Federation and Diabetes and Ramadan Alliance was specified. Data collection at baseline, after Ramadan, 3 months, and 6 months was conducted using a structured assessment questionnaire. Summary Female participants were 64.2%, and the average age was 52.2 ± 7.8 years. The mean total knowledge score rose from 26.3 ± 8.4 at baseline to 35.2 ± 6.9 ( p < 0.001) after 6 months. Ramadan-specific knowledge increased significantly, from 8.6 ± 3.3 to 11.0 ± 1.8 ( p < 0.001), and nutritional knowledge scores rose from 7.2 ± 3.1 to 9.5 ± 2.9 ( p < 0.001). Improvements in self-management practices were observed, including better identification of hypoglycemic symptoms (77.4–98.1%). Self-reported medication adherence rose from 41.5% to 71.7%. Among Egyptian adults with type 2 diabetes, a culturally tailored, Ramadan-focused diabetes education program greatly and sustainably boosted knowledge and self-management practices. Healthy fasting behaviors are improved by including religious and cultural contexts in diabetes education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alomari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: