Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 5, 2026PLoS ONEOpen Access

Influences of TiO2 and SiO2 nanofillers on the mechanical performance of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer after two years of outdoor tropical weathering: An in vitro study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BEBelal ElmarhoumyHospital Universiti Sains MalaysiaMSMahmoud SalloumSinai UniversityTBThamir BahattabJouf University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

In vitro study shows that 3% silica nanoparticles preserve maxillofacial silicone strength and flexibility after tropical weathering, indicating improved prosthesis durability.

Key Points

  • To determine how 3% and 10% weight concentrations of silicon dioxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles affect the mechanical durability of maxillofacial silicone elastomer following two years of natural tropical weathering.
  • Allocated 160 silicone specimens (80 dumbbell-shaped and 80 trouser-shaped) to non-weathered and weathered conditions across five subgroups (n = 8): unfilled control, 3% SiO2, 10% SiO2, 3% TiO2, and 10% TiO2.
  • Subjected weathered groups to outdoor tropical weathering for two years before measuring tear strength, tensile strength, and elongation at break using a universal testing machine.
  • Analyzed mechanical performance outcomes using two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests at α = 0.05.
  • In non-weathered specimens, 3% SiO2 increased tear strength by 34% (17.89 ± 0.31 vs. 13.38 ± 1.07 N/mm; P < 0.001) and tensile strength by 35% (4.28 ± 0.27 vs. 3.16 ± 0.13 MPa; P < 0.001) compared with unfilled controls.
  • Following two years of natural tropical weathering, only the 3% SiO2 group maintained significantly higher tear strength than the unfilled control (14.03 ± 2.10 vs. 11.09 ± 1.53 N/mm; P = 0.007).
  • Elongation at break decreased across all groups after weathering (P < 0.001), but nanoparticle-filled groups experienced substantially smaller elasticity losses (13.1–17.6%) than the unfilled control (51.1% loss).

Cite This Study

Elmarhoumy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9bd4346b95aff0620eba69https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357673
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influences of TiO2 and SiO2 nanofillers on the hardness and surface roughness of maxillofacial silicone elastomers after two years of outdoor tropical weathering: An in vitro study2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis2019 · 103 citations
  3. 3Effect of Silica Nanoparticles on Reinforcement of Poly(phenylene ether) Based Thermoplastic Elastomer2008 · 2 citations