Comparative linguistic analysis reveals nominalizing infixation in Proto-Malayo-Polynesian languages, refuting recent alternative etymologies for the Philippine noun dumágat.
This paper explores two interconnected issues: the curious history of the once-widespread Central Philippine noun dumágat and the previously-unexplored nominalizing function of the Proto-Malayo-Polynesian infix * . Relevant evidence is presented both from contemporary Philippine and Greater North Bornean languages, as well as from Spanish-era dictionaries of four Philippine languages dating back as far as 1613. The conclusion is reached that Proto-Greater Central Philippines *d ágat can be reconstructed with the meaning of 'person who lives near or frequents the sea; sea-oriented person', and that * must have had a nominalizing function at least as early as Proto-Malayo-Polynesian. Finally, the totality of the evidence is brought to bear in refuting an alternate etymology for dumágat which has appeared in the literature over the past decade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason William Lobel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: