Randomized trial reveals a 30% liver stiffness decrease has modest accuracy for detecting fibrosis regression in MASH, suggesting better non-invasive biomarkers are needed.
Background and Aims: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends that a decline in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) can be used as a non-invasive endpoint for treatment response in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), but there are limited data supporting this statement. We examined the association between a ≥30% relative decline in LSM and fibrosis regression. Approach and Results: This prospective study included 160 adults (64% female) with biopsy-proven MASH and stage 2-3 fibrosis from a randomized, phase 2b, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of the fibroblast growth factor 21 analog pegozafermin. All participants underwent contemporaneous VCTE assessments and liver biopsy at two time-points. The primary endpoint was fibrosis regression without worsening MASH. The median (IQR) age and body mass index of participants were 56.0 (49.0-62.0) years and 36.5 (32.2-40.4) kg/m². The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of a ≥30% relative decline in LSM by VCTE for detecting fibrosis regression was 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.77). In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, type 2 diabetes, BMI, and ethnicity, a ≥30% relative decline in LSM was independently associated with fibrosis regression (adjusted OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.79-10.38, p =0.001). In a distinct validation cohort (n=48) from U.S. and Singapore, a ≥30% decline in LSM for detecting fibrosis regression yielded an AUC of 0.62 (95% CI 0.48-0.76). Conclusion: A ≥30% relative decline in LSM by VCTE had modest accuracy to detect fibrosis regression without worsening MASH. More effective biomarkers for treatment response are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loomba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: