Theoretical framework uncovers thermodynamic dissipation boundaries in mesoporous forsterite grains, highlighting limits on preserving quantum encodings during thermal entropy release.
This record joins two existing lines without restating them. The silicate design papers specify Gao-type crystalline mesoporous forsterite (Mg₂SiO₄) as a durable host class and lock a Host-evaluation module on matched S0/S1 powders, with falsifiers F1–F3 still open. The Landauer–dissipation tensor and the Phonon Sink already state the thermodynamic envelope of an open quantum neural network: erasure of an unknown bit costs at least k_B T ln 2, dissipation belongs at a wall, and write-back of bath entropy into core parameters is identically zero. The manuscript places that envelope on the grain. A host can physically accommodate a multi-level encoding. A holder keeps that encoding while entropy leaves as heat rather than as logical dephasing. Native acoustic modes of the forsterite walls and the as-grown ~2.58 nm pore lattice may act as a passive sink; an engineered sink requires a specified resonator, bandgap, taper, or addressable mode. They are not interchangeable by renaming the pores. No paramagnetic density, nuclear spectral density, TLS (two-level system) spectrum, or coherence time is reported. No fidelity trajectory is claimed. Day-1 (XRD, FTIR, CW X-band EPR on matched S0/S1) remains the first experimental gate and is not executed here. If F1 or F2 fails after cleaning, Rank 5 is scaffold and encoding stays Regime C. If ¹H and pore-wall TLS are bounded and ²⁵Mg still kills the window, Branch Deplete is permitted but does not by itself make the grain a holder. If F3 fails and no nuclear window opens, Regime C is terminal on this grain. Parents: 10.5281/zenodo.21909312, 10.5281/zenodo.21923558, 10.5281/zenodo.21609954, 10.5281/zenodo.21611607, 10.5281/zenodo.20357738, 10.5281/zenodo.20597201, 10.5281/zenodo.20798938, 10.5281/zenodo.20803081, 10.5281/zenodo.22161547. Isolation and monitor records 22173068, 22206432, 22211512, and 22217506 are consumers of this constraint and are not rewritten here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venerable et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: