Computational benchmark demonstrates calibrated invariant discovery with zero false positives across physical datasets, suggesting improved reliability in scientific machine learning.
v3.2: adds Ethics statement, 7 new references (SINDy, DSR, SRBench, Severson 2019, Attia 2020, Co-Scientist 2026), citations embedded in Related Work and §6. CV→0 protocol: held-out validation, null calibration (FPR 0/100), compression tests, mechanical refusal taxonomy. 12-task benchmark vs PySR (6/3/0). Language ontogeny: word born from data, cross-domain transfer ×3.8. Battery case study: 273 cells, α-hierarchy, 2 universal claims refuted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evgeniy Dolgov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: