Validation study reveals universal power-law dynamics across battery cells while refuting broader universality claims, highlighting the necessity of honest refusal protocols in model discovery.
v3.1: adds three publication figures (adjudication pipeline flowchart, cross-chemistry α-hierarchy box plot, power-vs-stretched head-to-head scatter) and the repository URL (github.com/sensus-stoa/EvoFamily). Content identical to v3.0 otherwise. CV→0 protocol separating invariant discovery from predictive approximation: held-out validation, null calibration (FPR 0/100), compression tests, mechanical refusal taxonomy. Battery case study: 273 cells, power-law form universal, α chemistry- and protocol-specific, two universal claims refuted outside boundary regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evgeniy Dolgov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: