Mechanistic study reveals facet-dependent hydrogen evolution kinetics on platinum surfaces, highlighting interfacial water structure as a key driver for electrocatalysis.
Interfacial water structure is theoretically envisioned as the master regulator of electrocatalytic reaction kinetics, but the direct experimental validation of this role has remained a formidable challenge. Probing kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) is paramount to deciphering the elusive proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanisms in alkaline media, a long-standing enigma in electrocatalysis. Such precision, however, demands the uncompromising rigor of atomic-level-precise single-crystal electrodes and ultrapure D2O to ensure definitive results. Here, we uncover a hydrogen evolution reaction KIE that varies sharply with the surface structure: ∼6 for Pt(100), ∼1 for Pt(111), and intermediate values for Pt(110). Through a combination of nuclear–electronic orbital density functional theory (NEO-DFT) and in situ laser-induced temperature-jump (LITJ) experiments, we propose that this disparity originates from the difference between a rigid, hexagonal H-bonded network on Pt(111) and a more disordered, flexible interfacial layer on Pt(100) that would be more sensitive to isotopic substitution, as well as from differences in H/D adsorption sites, which would influence the effective proton transfer distances. Furthermore, measurements with stepped surfaces show that step density acts as a critical dial to tune these water environments. Finally, to bridge the knowledge gap between bulk single-crystals and practical nanoparticles, {100}-oriented Pt nanocubes and {111}-oriented Pt nanotetrahedrons reveal a facet-dependent KIE trend comparable to their single-crystal counterparts. These insights provide a transformative framework for the rational design of high-performance interfaces for green hydrogen production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Briega‐Martos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: