Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tool development study demonstrates a structured safety assessment for LGBTQIA+ scientists, highlighting practical protocols to mitigate identity-based hazards in fieldwork.
Ecological fieldwork poses heightened risks for LGBTQIA+ scientists due to inadequate safety protocols and identity-based vulnerabilities. Best practices to improve safety for queer field researchers exist, yet over 50% of LGBTQIA+ field scientists report feeling unsupported, with structural and cultural barriers unaddressed. Our team of 15 researchers from the University of California developed the Queer and Trans Field Safety Assessment: an example-based tool designed to support inclusive field environments. Drawing from best practices in field safety literature, the assessment offers a structured checklist that addresses safety needs before, during, and after fieldwork across four key categories: climate, protocols, training, and accessibility. This workbook is a workshop version of the Queer & Trans Field Safety Assessment (QTFSA). It helps you move through the assessment one section at a time, record current status for each prompt, review all responses together, and identify priorities for action. The workbook includes 5 main working sections and 105 total prompts. Thank you to Josie Otto, who turned our assessment into this excel workbook.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Payne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: