Meta-analysis reveals lower vitamin D levels and increased disease risk in infants with retinopathy of prematurity, suggesting vitamin D status may influence development and severity.
Purpose To evaluate the association between serum vitamin D levels and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus up to August 2026. All observational studies measuring vitamin D levels in infants with ROP were included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated using a random-effects model to assess differences in vitamin D levels between patients with ROP and healthy controls. The log odds ratio (OR) was computed to assess the association between vitamin D deficiency and the incidence of ROP. Results Ten relevant studies evaluating the relationship between vitamin D and ROP were included. Six studies, including 281 ROP infants, compared serum vitamin D levels between ROP and control groups. Five studies compared the risk of ROP development in the vitamin D-sufficient vs. deficient infants. Meta-analysis results revealed a significantly lower vitamin D level in ROP infants vs. control (SMD: -0.94, 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.67; I² = 48.26%, p-value < 0.001). Additionally, vitamin D levels were significantly lower in infants requiring ROP treatment than in the monitoring group. Furthermore, infants with vitamin D deficiency had a higher risk of ROP development (OR: 6.69, 95% CI: 1.65 to 27.4, p = 0.01). Conclusion The findings of the current study suggest that vitamin D status may be associated with the risk and severity of ROP in preterm infants. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to determine whether vitamin D status has an independent role in ROP and whether supplementation provides clinical benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pourazizi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: