Conceptual analysis demonstrates compatibility between intentional object-relationalism and physicalism, indicating relational theories of mind do not compromise ontological minimalism.
Relationalism, that is, the view that intentional states are essentially relational, and non‐relationalism, that is, the view that intentional states are non‐relational, is an ongoing debate within the domain of Intentionality. The advocates of non‐relationalism deny relationalism primarily on the grounds that it compromises ontological minimalism and physicalist metaphysics. In this paper, we advocate object‐relationalism, that is, the view that intentional states are relation to intentional objects, a specific variant of relationalism. We argue that object‐relationalism neither compromises ontological minimalism nor is inconsistent with physicalist metaphysics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sreenish S (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: