Perspective reviews catalytic mechanisms in alkane functionalization, highlighting strategies for small molecule upgrading and polyolefin upcycling.
Alkane dehydrogenation has evolved from a fundamental organometallic challenge into a transformative technology for upgrading abundant hydrocarbon feedstocks and modifying complex molecules. This Perspective charts the evolution of modern alkane dehydrogenation, emphasizing the strategic divergence between well-established two-electron pathways and emerging radical-mediated reaction manifolds. For the dehydrogenation of structurally unbiased simple alkanes, research remains centered on noble-metal-based molecular catalysts, represented by pincer–transition-metal systems, where activity and regioselectivity are not only governed by catalysts’ first coordination sphere but also subtly affected by ligands’ scaffold. In contrast, for the dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons with electronically or thermodynamically differentiated C(sp3)–H bonds, a complementary paradigm has emerged in which reactivity is mainly dictated by the intrinsic properties of substrates. The interplay of bond dissociation energies (BDEs) and bond polarity can be harnessed by a diverse array of hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reagents (or catalysts). We discuss how these two distinct mechanisms dictate the scope of both the dehydrogenation and dehydrogenation-triggered derivatization, which extends beyond small alkane functionalizations to controlled upcycling of macromolecular polyolefins. By analyzing the interplay between thermodynamic constraints, catalyst sustainability, and process integration, we outline a forward-looking roadmap for next-generation catalytic dehydrogenation systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: