This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Molecular geometries and electronic structures of manganese binuclear complexes, [(H(2)O)(3)(O-)Mn(bis-mu-oxo-O(2))Mn(OH(2))(4)](q+) (q = 2 or 3), which are model complexes of the S(3) state in the Kok cycle of OEC, were examined using hybrid density functional theory and broken symmetry method. The complexes of q = 2 and 3, which have a Mn-O bond, correspond to those derived from Mn(2)(II,III) and Mn(2)(III,III) at the S(0) state of the Kok cycle. The conformers with the Mn-O bond axial to the Mn(2)O(2) core are lower in energy than those with the equatorial Mn-O bond. The equatorial Mn-O bonds are assigned as Mn(III)-O*(-) and Mn(IV)-O*(-) for M(2)(II,III) and M(2)(III,III) series, respectively. The axial Mn-O bonds are Mn(IV)=O(2-) for M(2)(II,III) and Mn(IV)-O*(-) for Mn(2)(III,III). The characters of Mn-O orbitals are pi-orbitals composed of d-p interactions. The conformer with the axial Mn(IV)=O(2-) derived from M(2)(II,III) at S(0) is thermochemically unstable, leading to proton transfer to give two OHs in the complex, while the axial Mn(IV)-O*(-) from Mn(2)(III,III) at S(0) is stable without the proton transfer. The magnetic interactions between two Mn ions and O were also examined by estimations of effective exchange integrals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsuda et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: