Experimental analysis reveals over 43% indicated efficiency for hydrous methanol in internal combustion engines, suggesting distillation energy can be spared for serial hybrids.
This paper shows the advantages of methanol as a fuel and compares pure methanol (>99.9%) and methanol with a high‐water content (>18%) for use in an internal combustion engine. 18% water content is representative for methanol synthesized from hydrogen and industrial furnace gases as a carbon dioxide source. The achievable best point indicated efficiency is higher than 43% for both fuels. The increased water content of the low‐purity methanol is compensated by a longer injection time and can approximately be compared to a constant exhaust gas recirculation, which cannot be adjusted to the operating condition. Therefore, the best efficiency operation points are limited to a middle engine speed range and high load, which perfectly fits to a serial hybrid powertrain topology (Range Extender). The paper shows that additional energy that may be required for methanol distillation to high purity can be saved without losing combustion efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobberkau et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: