Constructive research study reveals critical architectural gaps in performance management for state-owned enterprises, highlighting the necessity of integrated governance and execution consistency.
Performance management systems are widely adopted, yet productivity outcomes remain inconsistent, even among organisations using the same established frameworks. This paper develops a prescriptive design proposition for performance management system architecture in non-listed Indonesian oil and gas state-owned enterprises. Using Constructive Research Methodology, six design criteria are derived from a PLS-SEM study of 256 mid-to-senior managers, then tested for convergence against independent design requirements drawn from the performance measurement literature. Six established frameworks are audited against these criteria using a documented, independently double-coded protocol. The resulting six-layer architecture specifies a Governance Integration Layer, a Strategy Translation Protocol, a Behavioural Activation Module, an Execution Consistency System, a Serial Execution Chain Architecture, and an Integrated Feedback and Learning Loop. Content validity was assessed through a two-round Delphi study with 15 experts. Governance integration and execution consistency are the two criteria least specified as named architectural components in the frameworks reviewed. The paper contributes a re-derivation procedure for obtaining context-specific design criteria from structural evidence, an instrumented specification of execution consistency, and governance specified as a named design layer with assigned actors, mechanisms and review cadences. As no organisation has implemented the framework, a protocol for effectiveness testing is specified for further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: