Geophysical inversion study demonstrates enhanced subsurface elastic parameter estimation in seismic data, indicating reduced uncertainty through joint PP- and PS-wave integration.
An extension of the Bayesian linearized AVO inversion framework is presented to jointly incorporate PP- and PS-wave seismic reflection data for improved prediction of elastic subsurface properties. The inversion is based on a convolutional model and a weak contrast linearization of the Zoeppritz equations. The inclusion of PS-wave data increases sensitivity to shear properties, enabling enhanced resolution of S-wave velocity and elastic parameter ratios such as VP/VS V P / V S . The inverse problem is formulated in a Bayesian Gaussian framework, with explicit expressions for the posterior mean and covariance of the model variables, including P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density. The joint inversion of PP- and PS-wave data leads to improved constraints on the posterior distributions, compared to the PP-only inversion. Synthetic tests, based on a field dataset from the Norwegian Sea, demonstrate that the joint inversion reduces prediction uncertainty and improves accuracy under realistic noise conditions. Application to a 3-D multicomponent field dataset from a Brazilian oil field shows better match of the inversion results with well log data compared to PP-only results, particularly for VP/VS V P / V S , confirming the added value of incorporating PS information into the Bayesian AVO inversion framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Correa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: