What does this research mean for the field?

Time is not an independent ontological background, but rather a property of the relational organization of reality, intelligible through synchrony and diachrony across material, biological, and human strata. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.NOVEL_FINDING. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.ESTABLISHES_NEW_DIRECTION.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To develop a relational ontology of time grounded in the Philosophy of Belonging by distinguishing transformation, directionality, and temporal measurement without positing an independent Newtonian temporal background.

September 5, 2026Open Access

Time, Life, and Death: Belonging and the Arrow of Time

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

CDCarlos Federico Obregon Diaz

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Theoretical analysis reveals time as an emergent relational organization across physical and biological systems, indicating that time belongs to reality rather than reality belonging to time.

Key Points

To develop a relational ontology of time grounded in the Philosophy of Belonging by distinguishing transformation, directionality, and temporal measurement without positing an independent Newtonian temporal background.
Comparative analysis of foundational physical paradigms, including Newtonian absolute time, Leibnizian relationalism, Einsteinian relativity, Barbour's relational mechanics, the ADM formulation, and the Wheeler–DeWitt problem of time.
Application of a dual-structure framework using synchrony (relational configuration) and diachrony (transformational dynamics) to examine cosmological, thermodynamic, biological, and existential phenomena.
Cosmological expansion and thermodynamic asymmetry are categorized as arrows of transformation rather than evidence for an autonomous arrow of time.
Biological processes such as evolutionary adaptation, reproduction, birth, and death represent diachronic relational transformations extending beyond individual organisms.
Human existential awareness of mortality is shown to operate within broader synchronic and diachronic relations, establishing that time belongs to the relational organization of reality.

Cite This Study

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9bd48c6b95aff0620ec575 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22285617

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Theoretical analysis reveals time as an emergent relational organization across physical and biological systems, indicating that time belongs to reality rather than reality belonging to time.

Time, Life, and Death: Belonging and the Arrow of Time

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Time, Life, and Death: Belonging and the Arrow of Time

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider