Experimental testing reveals limestone filler reduces cracking sensitivity in cement-based materials under arid conditions, suggesting improved durability for desert construction.
Early-age cracking severely limits concrete durability in hot, arid environments due to rapid plastic and drying shrinkage. This study evaluates the cracking sensitivity of cement-based materials incorporating four local supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs): limestone filler from Djebel Béchar, natural pozzolan, silica fume, and gypsum under simulated arid conditions (55 °C, 12% relative humidity, 10 km/h wind). Using a custom climatic chamber, prismatic cement-grout specimens with internal restraints were tested. SCMs were evaluated at substitution rates of 2% to 8%. Limestone was further tested at higher rates (up to 40%) and in binary combinations. Findings were validated using micro-concrete with limestone substitutions (0–35%) combined with 4% natural pozzolan. Cracking sensitivity was assessed using maximum crack width and a cracking index, along with setting times and mechanical strengths. Results indicate that limestone filler demonstrated the most favourable performance. A 4% limestone substitution yielded a single crack with a maximum width of 0.1 mm, while an 8% substitution resulted in five cracks of about 0.2 mm. The optimal cracking index was achieved at a 35% limestone substitution rate, which also successfully extended initial and final setting times. While binary SCM combinations significantly reduced cracking compared to the unsubstituted reference, they did not outperform the optimal 35% single limestone substitution. Furthermore, the 28-day compressive and flexural tensile strengths of the micro-concrete were effectively maintained at up to 35% limestone combined with 4% pozzolan. Overall, these preliminary findings demonstrate that crushed limestone fines from Djebel Béchar are highly promising as partial cement replacements to improve concrete durability in arid climates. Further durability assessments and statistical validation are recommended to confirm these benefits for practical field applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: