Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate 25-OH vitamin D concentrations in 2 independent systemic sclerosis (SSc) populations from France and Italy. METHODS: We studied 156 consecutive SSc patients comparable for demographic characteristics: 90 from Northern France and 66 from Southern Italy. 25-OH vitamin D, intact parathyroid hormone, and serum total calcium and phosphorus were measured in all patients. Vitamin D concentrations < 30 ng/ml were considered insufficiency, while values < 10 ng/ml were classified as deficiency. RESULTS: Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency rates were very high and comparable between the 2 populations: 74/90 (82%) versus 57/66 (86%) for insufficiency and 29/90 (32%) versus 15/66 (23%) for deficiency, respectively, in the French and Italian patients. They were not influenced by vitamin D supplementation, which was not statistically different in the 2 groups. In the combined populations, a significant negative correlation was found between low vitamin D levels and European Disease Activity Score (p = 0.04, r = -0.17) and an even more significant correlation was found with acute-phase reactants (p = 0.004, r = -0.23 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate), and low levels of vitamin D were associated with the systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) estimated by echocardiography (p = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, vitamin D deficiency was associated with sPAP (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency was very common in the 2 SSc populations, independent of geographic origin and vitamin D supplementation. This suggests that common vitamin D supplementation does not correct the deficiency in SSc patients, and that a higher dose is probably needed, especially in those with high inflammatory activity or severe disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vacca et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: