Why the study?
CLTI carries a high risk of adverse limb events and mortality, with high or low on-treatment platelet reactivity linked to ischemic or bleeding risks, respectively. The study examined how often patients with CLTI achieve a therapeutic window of platelet inhibition on clopidogrel or ticagrelor.
Does ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily improve the achievement of a therapeutic window of platelet inhibition compared to clopidogrel 75 mg daily in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia?
Observational (n=50)
Does ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily improve the achievement of a therapeutic window of platelet inhibition compared to clopidogrel 75 mg daily in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia?
In patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia, ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily leads to excessive platelet inhibition compared to clopidogrel, frequently resulting in low on-treatment platelet reactivity rather than a therapeutic window.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ticagrelor causes excessive platelet inhibition in most CLTI patients; leaves open whether dose adjustment improves safety or efficacy.
Background: Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with an increased risk of major adverse limb events and mortality. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic events, while low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. This study investigates the frequency with which patients with CLTI on clopidogrel or ticagrelor achieve a “therapeutic window” (TW) of platelet inhibition. Methods: Data from the “Switch To Ticagrelor in Critical Limb Ischemia Anti-Platelet Study” were assessed retrospectively to determine the incidence of TW of on-treatment platelet reactivity in 50 consecutive patients with CLTI (mean age: 65.2 ± 10.5 years, 54% male). The data included 4 measurements of patients’ platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay: baseline and steady state platelet reactivity on clopidogrel 75 mg daily and on ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. Results: At baseline, 46% of patients on clopidogrel were within TW of on-treatment platelet reactivity compared to 10% of patients on ticagrelor ( P < .0001). At steady state, 42% of patients on clopidogrel were within the TW compared to 10% of patients on ticagrelor ( P < .0001). Patients on ticagrelor exhibited higher rates of LPR compared to those on clopidogrel at baseline as well as at steady state (baseline 88% vs 18%, steady state 88% vs 28%; P < .0001). Conclusion: Although ticagrelor has been proposed as an alternative for patients with HPR on clopidogrel, the current study observes an excess of platelet inhibition with ticagrelor in most patients with CLTI at a dose of 90 mg twice daily.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhillon et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Critical limb-threatening ischemia (n=50). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel 75 mg daily was evaluated on Therapeutic window of on-treatment platelet reactivity at steady state (p=<.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: