Key result
Ticagrelor significantly reduced the rate of sustained high on-treatment platelet reactivity at 24 hours compared to double-dose clopidogrel (5.9% vs 43.8%) in Chinese patients after elective PCI.
Why the study?
Does ticagrelor improve platelet inhibition compared to double-dose clopidogrel in Chinese patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after elective PCI?
RCT (n=40)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does ticagrelor improve platelet inhibition compared to double-dose clopidogrel in Chinese patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after elective PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.9% vs 43.8%
p-value: p=<0.05
In Chinese patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after elective PCI, ticagrelor provides more rapid and potent platelet inhibition than double-dose clopidogrel.
Supports ticagrelor for rapid platelet inhibition in Chinese elective PCI patients; confirms superiority over double-dose clopidogrel.
Previous studies have identified high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) as a potent factor predicting ischemic events for patients with coronary heart disease. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor (90 mg twice-daily) and double-dose of clopidogrel (150 mg once-daily) among Chinese patients for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. We enrolled 40 patients with HTPR from among 317 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes after a successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet reactivity was measured by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Platelet reactivity was significantly lower for both groups when compared with baseline platelet reactivity after medication adjustment (all P < 0.001). The mean platelet reactivity units (PRU) was significantly lower for the ticagrelor group compared with that of the clopidogrel group over time (all P < 0.001). The differences in the rate of sustained HTPR at different time points between the two groups were significant (2 hours: 0% versus 60%; 8 hours: 5.6% versus 50%; 24 hours: 5.9% versus 43.8%, all P < 0.05). Genetic variation of CYP2C19*2 had no impact on PRU means or rate of HTPR in the ticagrelor group (P > 0.05). During the 30-day follow-up, no MACE occurred in any patient, and the overall risk of bleeding showed no difference between the two groups (35% versus 21%, P = 0.48). Our results suggest that ticagrelor may achieve a more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than double-dose clopidogrel. Further studies are still needed to assess the differences in efficacy and safety between ticagrelor and double-dose clopidogrel administration for Chinese patients post elective PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in High on-treatment platelet reactivity after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=40). Ticagrelor vs. Double-dose clopidogrel (150 mg daily) was evaluated on Rate of sustained high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) at 24 hours (p=<0.05). Ticagrelor significantly reduced the rate of sustained high on-treatment platelet reactivity at 24 hours compared to double-dose clopidogrel (5.9% vs 43.8%) in Chinese patients after elective PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: