This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aims: We aimed to assess the comparative efficiency and safety of the use of glyburide, metformin, and insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials that compared glyburide, metformin, and insulin in GDM. Data regarding glycemic control and neonatal safety were collected and analyzed in pairwise and network meta-analyses.Results: A total of 4,683 individuals from 24 trials were included. Compared with glyburide, metformin reduced 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2HPG) to a greater extent (standard mean difference (SMD) 0.18; 95% credible interval (CI) 0–0.36). There were significantly lower prevalences of neonatal hypoglycemia (risk difference (RD) −0.07; 95%CI−0.11–−0.03), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RD−0.03; 95%CI−0.06–−0), and preeclampsia (RD−0.03; 95%CI−0.06–−0) in the metformin group than in the insulin group. The metformin group had significantly lower birth weight (SMD−0.25; 95%CI−0.41–−0.10) and maternal weight gain (SMD−0.61; 95%CI−0.86–−0.35) compared with the insulin group. Network meta-analysis suggested that metformin had the highest probability of successfully controlling glycemia and preventing neonatal complications.Conclusions: The present meta-analysis suggests that metformin may be as effective as insulin for glycemic control and is the most promising drug for the prevention of neonatal and maternal complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: