Key result
Spinal cord injury patients had significantly reduced cardiovagal function compared to healthy controls, including lower heart rate response to deep breathing (7.7 vs 17.6 beats/min; p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does a modified autonomic reflex screen identify autonomic impairments in patients with spinal cord injury compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=30)
Does a modified autonomic reflex screen identify autonomic impairments in patients with spinal cord injury compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.7% vs 17.6%
p-value: p=<0.05
A modified autonomic reflex screen demonstrates significant cardiovagal impairment in patients with spinal cord injury compared to healthy controls.
Spinal cord injury impairs cardiovagal function; Level 5 evidence leaves open its prognostic value and management implications.
The aim of this study was to characterize autonomic lesions in participants with spinal cord injury (SCI; n = 10) using an autonomic reflex screen, incorporating sudomotor, cardiovagal, and sympathetic adrenergic tests, as well as hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt (HUT). Hemodynamic responses were compared to healthy controls ( n = 20) and previously published normative cutoffs in order better identify autonomic impairments. Sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), heart rate response to deep breathing (HR DB ), and heart rate and beat-to-beat blood pressure responses to Valsalva maneuver (VM) and HUT were measured. SCI participants demonstrated impairment in at least one domain, with 7 of 10 demonstrating autonomic impairment across all domains. No single test was concordant with orthostatic hypotension on HUT, in all participants. Measures of cardiovagal function, including HR DB (SCI = 7.7 ± 3.8 beats/min vs. controls = 17.6 ± 8.1 beats/min) and Valsalva ratio (SCI = 1.53 ± 0.29 vs. controls = 1.85 ± 0.37), were significantly reduced in SCI participants, compared to controls ( p < 0.05). These findings suggest that an autonomic reflex screen, which includes standardized testing protocol and normative data for comparison, is useful for determining the autonomic domains affected by the neurological injury in SCI. We also demonstrated significant cardiovagal impairment in SCI participants compared to controls, which warrants further investigation to determine whether cardiovagal dysfunction is associated with the negative cardiovascular outcomes, which are known to occur in SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Spinal cord injury (n=30). Spinal cord injury vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Heart rate response to deep breathing (beats/min) (p=<0.05). Spinal cord injury patients had significantly reduced cardiovagal function compared to healthy controls, including lower heart rate response to deep breathing (7.7 vs 17.6 beats/min; p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: