This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The performance of several density functionals for the description of 3-body interactions was evaluated on three benchmark data sets: 3B-69, S22(3), and 3BHET. Only a few DFT methods achieve consistent accuracy, notably B97-based functionals (ωB97X-V, ωB97X-D, and B97M-V) and double hybrids such as PBE-QIDH-D3(BJ) and B2-PLYP-D3(BJ). If dispersion corrections are essential for describing 2-body interactions, accurate 3-body energies require the presence of a significant fraction of Hartree–Fock exchange. Among dispersion models, those casting information from the electron density, like VV10, XDM, and MBD, provide the best performance. These last models also provide a qualitative agreement with the classical Axilrod–Teller–Muto model for trimers in the S22(3) data set, an indication that they provide a reasonable description of the long-range dispersion component of the 3-body interactions. Overall, these data sets remain more challenging than standard noncovalent benchmarks due to the subtle electronic effects governing many-body interactions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massafra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: