Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY Microbial growth patterns in rehydrated freeze‐dried chicken at 4, 20, 30, and 37°C are similar to those of rehydrated freeze‐dried shrimp, and are greatly influenced by storage temperature, time, and initial number of microorganisms present. Lag time was shortest at 37 and 30°C, four times as long at 20°C as at 37°C, and 120 times as long at 4°C as at 37°C. At 37°C, the maximum population was 300,000 times the initial population, while at 30°C it was 115,000 times wafter 26 hr. The microbial population increased 100,000‐fold at 55 hr at 20°C, and 500‐fold at 15 days at 4°C. A natural contaminant in the freeze‐dried chicken examined, eoagulase‐positive Staphylococcus aureus , was found to be at a level of 3040 organisms per gram, out of a total population of 10° organisms per gram. Fecal enterococci were also present in the freeze‐dried material at a level of about 10° to 10° per gram. Rehydration studies show that Staphylococcus aureus and “fecal enterococci” as natural contaminants in freeze‐dried chicken can grow in competition with the natural flora at 20 °C or above and that the competition may be due to the nature of the microbial distribution on the chicken surface. Refrigeration temperatures in the vicinity of 4°C completely suppressed the growth of S. aureus and greatly extended the shelf life of rehydrated chicken.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pablo et al. (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: