Key result
Routine manual thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI does not improve mortality and is associated with an increased risk of stroke (HR 2.06) compared to PCI alone.
Why the study?
Does routine manual thrombectomy improve mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does routine manual thrombectomy improve mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Routine use of manual thrombectomy during primary PCI for STEMI does not improve clinical outcomes and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, supporting its Class III guideline recommendation.
Manual thrombectomy (MT) with an aspiration catheter is frequently used in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI). It is used to reduce the thrombus burden and the risk of no-reflow in the infarct related artery. This article summarises a chronological overview of the available evidence for its routine use in PPCI. An early series of small randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a benefit of PPCI with MT over percutaneous coronary intervention alone, mainly when considering intermediate endpoints reflecting myocardial reperfusion. However, a recent series of large multicentre RCTs failed to corroborate the initial enthusiasm for MT, showing no improved benefit on hard endpoints such as mortality when compared with PPCI without MT. Furthermore, the largest RCT to date raised safety concerns after reporting an increased stroke risk after MT. We review the background, value, and implications of the current evidence before concluding that the routine use of MT in PPCI for STEMI should not be encouraged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Floré et al. (2016) conducted a review in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Routine manual thrombectomy vs. Percutaneous coronary intervention alone was evaluated. Routine manual thrombectomy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI does not improve mortality and is associated with an increased risk of stroke (HR 2.06) compared to PCI alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: