Key result
Blood flow restriction training showed clinical improvements surpassing the minimal clinically important difference in most patient-reported outcome and physical function measures.
Why the study?
Blood flow restriction training is widely studied in lower limb pathology, but research on its use in upper limb disorders is limited.
Does resistance exercise enhanced with blood flow restriction training improve skeletal muscle mass, strength, pain, and function in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders?
Systematic Review
Does resistance exercise enhanced with blood flow restriction training improve skeletal muscle mass, strength, pain, and function in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders?
Blood flow restriction training may offer clinical improvements in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation, but current evidence is limited, of low quality, and poorly reported.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-quality evidence suggests BFRT may improve upper limb outcomes; leaves open routine adoption pending higher-quality trials.
BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is a widely studied strategy in lower limb pathology; however, BFRT research in upper limb disorders is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of BFRT programs on skeletal muscle mass, strength, pain, and function in upper limb musculoskeletal disorders rehabilitation and to analyze the reporting quality of the exercise content. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online, SPORTDiscus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines from inception to May 2023. The results included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, and case report studies of patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders treated with resistance exercise enhanced with BFRT and reporting at least one outcome related to skeletal muscle mass, strength, pain or function/disability. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0, and the reporting quality was evaluated with the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). RESULTS: Four RCTs, one case series, and four case report studies were included. Very low-quality studies showed a pattern of clinical improvements surpassing the minimal clinically important difference in most patient-reported outcome and physical function measures. The risk of bias in the included studies was high. The CERT revealed poor description of the BFRT programs. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified limited and low-quality evidence that BFRT is effective in the physical rehabilitation of patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the reporting of BFRT content in patients with upper limb disorders is poor. We recommend that authors use the CERT guideline when reporting the exercise protocols and results of trials investigating BFRT interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ponce‐Fuentes et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) was evaluated on Skeletal muscle mass, strength, pain, and function. Blood flow restriction training showed clinical improvements surpassing the minimal clinically important difference in most patient-reported outcome and physical function measures.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: