Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since the dye- and electronic couplings between the carotid body chief cells have been demonstrated, the detection and localization of the gap junctions in the carotid body is crucial to understanding the functional mechanism of chemoreception. However, conventional electron microscopy has been unsuccessful in unquestionably detecting ultrastructural features equivalent to the gap junctions, such as close (2 nm in width) membrane appositions in ultrathin sections and aggregations of intramembranous particles in freeze-fracture replicas of the carotid body. We previously reported using a modified electron microscopic study by chemically fixed and subsequent rapid freezing and freeze-substitution method a number of close membrane appositions comparable to the gap junctions. However, we later found that the freeze-substitution also induces numerous close apposition of the membrane in sites where the gap junctions are not known to occur, indicating that the modified electron microscopy by freeze-substitution is not always confirmative in the detection of the gap junction. With regard to the molecular evidence for the gap junction in the carotid body, there have so far been few data on the immunohistochemical demonstration on connexin 32 and 43 in cultured chief cells, but not in the in situ cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hisatake Kondo (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: