Key result
Addition of alogliptin 12.5 mg or 25 mg to pioglitazone significantly reduced HbA1c compared to placebo (-0.66% and -0.80% vs -0.19%, P<0.001) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does alogliptin added to pioglitazone improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on a thiazolidinedione?
RCT (n=493)
Double-blind
2:2:1
Yes
Does alogliptin added to pioglitazone improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on a thiazolidinedione?
The addition of alogliptin to pioglitazone significantly improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on a thiazolidinedione.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports alogliptin addition to pioglitazone in T2D; extends evidence for DPP-4 inhibitor add-on to thiazolidinediones.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by therapy with a thiazolidinedione (TZD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, 493 patients 18-80 years old with inadequate glycemic control after stabilization (i.e., glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] 7.0-10.0%) despite ongoing treatment with a TZD were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to treatment with pioglitazone plus alogliptin 12.5 mg, alogliptin 25 mg or placebo once daily. Concomitant therapy with metformin or sulfonylurea at prestudy doses was permitted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to Week 26. Secondary endpoints included changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight, and incidences of marked hyperglycemia (FPG > or = 200 mg/dL [11.10 mmol/L]) and rescue for hyperglycemia. RESULTS: Least squares (LS) mean change in HbA(1c) was significantly (p < 0.001) greater for alogliptin 12.5 mg (-0.66%) or 25 mg (-0.80%) than for placebo (-0.19%). A significantly (p < or = 0.016) larger proportion of patients achieved HbA(1c) < or = 7% with alogliptin 12.5 mg (44.2%) or 25 mg (49.2%) than with placebo (34.0%). LS mean decreases in FPG were significantly (p = 0.003) greater with alogliptin 12.5 mg (-19.7 mg/dL [-1.09 mmol/L]) or 25 mg (-19.9 mg/dL [-1.10 mmol/L]) than with placebo (-5.7 mg/dL [-0.32 mmol/L]). The percentage of patients with marked hyperglycemia was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for alogliptin (< or =25.0%) than placebo (44.3%). The incidences of overall adverse events and hypoglycemia were similar across treatment groups, but cardiac events occurred more often with active treatment than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of alogliptin to pioglitazone therapy significantly improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and was generally well tolerated. The study did not evaluate the effect of combination therapy on long-term clinical outcomes and safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00286494, clinicaltrials.gov.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratley et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by a thiazolidinedione (n=493). Alogliptin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in HbA(1c) from baseline to Week 26 (p=< 0.001). Addition of alogliptin 12.5 mg or 25 mg to pioglitazone significantly reduced HbA1c compared to placebo (-0.66% and -0.80% vs -0.19%, P<0.001) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: