Randomized trial found similar HbA1c changes with pioglitazone and dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes, indicating effective options for glycemic control.
We investigated the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone compared to dapagliflozin when added to metformin plus alogliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes. The patients (n = 133) were randomized to receive pioglitazone (n = 65) or dapagliflozin (n = 68) in addition to metformin and alogliptin therapy for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in HbA1c. The non-inferiority margin for HbA1c reduction was 0.4%. The adjusted mean change of HbA1c at week 26 was - 0.75% with pioglitazone and - 0.88% with dapagliflozin (mean difference: 0.12% [95% CI - 0.09 to 0.34]). The adjusted mean change of HOMA-IR at week 26 was - 1.55 with pioglitazone and - 1.96 with dapagliflozin (mean difference: 0.41 [95% CI - 0.01 to 0.83]). Lipid profiles were similar between the groups. The proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 6.5% was similar between groups. Pioglitazone added to metformin and alogliptin significantly improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, and was non-inferior to dapagliflozin. This study suggests that pioglitazone could be an effective and safe option for patients with inadequate glycemic control on metformin and DPP4i.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: