Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative experimental study reveals distinct particle trapping dynamics between evanescent and plasmonic surface waves, indicating photothermal absorption alters near-field optical manipulation.
Near-field optical trapping can be realized with focused evanescent waves that are excited at the water-glass interface due to the total internal reflection, or with focused plasmonic waves excited on the water-gold interface. Herein, the performance of these two kinds of near-field optical trapping techniques is compared using the same optical microscope configuration. Experimental results show that only a single-micron polystyrene bead can be trapped by the focused evanescent waves, whereas many beads are simultaneously attracted to the center of the excited region by focused plasmonic waves. This difference in trapping behavior is analyzed from the electric field intensity distributions of these two kinds of focused surface waves and the difference in trapping behavior is attributed to photothermal effects due to the light absorption by the gold film.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: