Key result
Higher baseline NT-proBNP was an independent risk factor for in-hospital infection in STEMI patients undergoing PCI (adjusted OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.73; P=0.003).
Why the study?
Infections worsen outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, but identifying patients at high risk of infection remains difficult and the predictive value of NT-proBNP is unknown.
Does baseline NT-proBNP level predict in-hospital infection and MACE in STEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort
Does baseline NT-proBNP level predict in-hospital infection and MACE in STEMI patients undergoing PCI?
Baseline NT-proBNP levels can accurately predict the risk of in-hospital infection and subsequent major adverse clinical events in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.
Background: Infections increase the risk of poor outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, predicting patients at a high risk of developing infection remains unclear. Moreover, the value of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for predicting infection is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess the relationship between NT-proBNP and the following development of infection, and clinical adverse outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. Methods: STEMI patients undergoing PCI were consecutively enrolled from January 2010 to July 2016 and divided into groups according to baseline NT-proBNP levels: tertiles T1 (<988 pg/mL), T2 (988–3520 pg/mL), and T3 (≥3520 pg/mL). The primary endpoint was infection during hospitalization. Results: A total of 182 (27%) patients developed in-hospital infection. The incidence of infection increased from T1 to T3 (10.5, 17.7, and 54.5%, P < 0.001). NT-proBNP was an independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12–1.73, P = 0.003) and presented accurately predicting infection (area under curve = 0.774). Multivariate cox analysis showed that NT-proBNP was a significant risk factor for major adverse clinical events (MACE) at follow-up (adjusted HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.61–2.29, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The baseline NT-proBNP level has a good predictive value for infection and MACE in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Baseline NT-proBNP vs. Lower NT-proBNP levels was evaluated on Infection during hospitalization (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12-1.73, p=0.003). Higher baseline NT-proBNP was an independent risk factor for in-hospital infection in STEMI patients undergoing PCI (adjusted OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.73; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: