Key result
The diagnostic accuracy and overall safety of intravenous adenosine thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging were generally similar in women compared with men.
Why the study?
Does the diagnostic accuracy and safety of intravenous adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging differ between women and men with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Cohort
Open-label
No
Does the diagnostic accuracy and safety of intravenous adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging differ between women and men with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging provides comparable diagnostic accuracy and overall safety in both men and women who are unable to exercise adequately.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adenosine MPI in women unable to exercise; leaves open prospective validation in contemporary cohorts.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohiuddin et al. (1996) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease. Intravenous adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging in women vs. Men was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy and safety. The diagnostic accuracy and overall safety of intravenous adenosine thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging were generally similar in women compared with men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: