Key result
An autocorrelation-based technique for automated segmentation of the left-ventricular chamber yielded borders highly comparable to manual detection, with a relative error of 4.2%-6%.
The proposed autocorrelation-based technique provides robust automated segmentation of endocardial borders in 3D echocardiograms, facilitating wall motion tracking for ischemia detection.
May aid automated LV border detection in echo; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Left-ventricular (LV) segmentation is essential in the early detection of heart disease, where left-ventricular wall motion is being tracked in order to detect ischemia. In this paper, a new method for automated segmentation of the left-ventricular chamber is described. An autocorrelation-based technique isolates the LV cavity from the myocardial wall on 2-D slices of 3D short-axis echocardiograms. A morphological closing function and median filtering are used to generate a uniform border. The proposed segmentation technique is designed to be used in identifying the endocardial border and estimating the motion of the endocardial wall over a cardiac cycle. To this purpose, the proposed technique is particularly successful in border delineation by tracing around structures like papillary muscles and the mitral valve, which constitute the typical obstacle in LV segmentation techniques. The results using this new technique are compared to the manual detection results in short-axis views obtained at the papillary muscle level from 3D datasets in human and canine experiments in vivo. Qualitatively, the automatically-detected borders are highly comparable to the manually-detected borders enclosing regions in the left-ventricular cavity with a relative error within the range of 4.2%-6%. Thus, the new technique constitutes a robust segmentation method for automated segmentation of endocardial borders and is suitable for wall motion tracking for automated detection of ischemia in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morda et al. (2006) studied Heart disease / Ischemia. Autocorrelation-based automated segmentation technique vs. Manual detection was evaluated on Relative error of automatically-detected borders compared to manually-detected borders. An autocorrelation-based technique for automated segmentation of the left-ventricular chamber yielded borders highly comparable to manual detection, with a relative error of 4.2%-6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: