Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The photochemical reaction of 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane (a spin-trapping agent) in benzene was studied at 299 K by monitoring the optical absorption intensity of the spin-trapping agent and the ESR signal intensity of the spin-adduct radical (di-t-butyl nitroxide). The observed kinetic feature was interpreted in terms of three elementary processes; the photodissociation of the spin-trapping agent giving a t-butyl radical, the spin trapping of the t-butyl radical by the trapping agent giving the spin adduct radical, and the reaction of the spin-adduct radical with the t-butyl radical giving diamagnetic products. The rate constant of the last process was found to be 10 times as large as that of the spin-trapping process, which was determined to be 3.3×106 mol−1 dm3 s−1 based on the reported rate constant for the scavenging of the t-butyl radical by tributylstannane. The relative spin-trapping rate constants toward the t-butyl radical were also determined to be 0.07, 1.0, 41, 63, and much higher than 50 for 2,4,6-tri-t-butylnitrosobenzene, 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane, pentamethylnitrosobenzene, nitrosodurene and nitrosobenzene, respectively. C-phenyl-N-t-butylnitrone was found to be much less reactive by a factor of less than 0.003.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doba et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: