A comparison of two radio propagation channel impulse response determination techniques is described. Presented are typical impulse response and transfer functions obtained from each measurement system. Also included for comparison are average impulse response envelopes and cumulative probability distributions for the RMS delay spread of static indoor radio channels calculated from 120 measurements using each system. The comparisons show good agreement between results.>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tholl et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: